Talk:RadiMation Application Note 100: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I do have | I do have a few remarks for the improvements of this application note: | ||
* The | * The last screenshot: ([[:File:EnhancedWindowWithTest.png]]), shows an EUT window, a test and the Enhanced status window. The EUT Window is not relevant for the purpose of the screenshot, but it does cause that the screenshot is very wide. I think we should improve the screenshot to NOT show the EUT window. | ||
* The values on all the screenshots that show the enhanced status window are very strange. They should be updated to show more logical values (maybe configure it in the KETC??): | |||
* The | ** The last screenshot ([[:File:EnhancedWindowWithTest.png]]) shows: -200 dBm signal power (How is that possible??) while the field is expected to be almost 100 V/m. That is practically not possible. Also the frequency is just too low. At 280 kHz no 100 V/m can be generated. | ||
** The horizontal screenshot shows a frequency of 1 Hz. | |||
* The | ** The vertical screenshot shows a frequency of 1 Hz | ||
* | |||
* | |||
== Review status == | |||
Did review. See remarks above. [[User:Joro|Joro]] ([[User talk:Joro|talk]]) 09:39, 30 January 2019 (CET) | |||
[[User: | |||
[[User:Joro| |
Revision as of 08:39, 30 January 2019
I do have a few remarks for the improvements of this application note:
- The last screenshot: (File:EnhancedWindowWithTest.png), shows an EUT window, a test and the Enhanced status window. The EUT Window is not relevant for the purpose of the screenshot, but it does cause that the screenshot is very wide. I think we should improve the screenshot to NOT show the EUT window.
- The values on all the screenshots that show the enhanced status window are very strange. They should be updated to show more logical values (maybe configure it in the KETC??):
- The last screenshot (File:EnhancedWindowWithTest.png) shows: -200 dBm signal power (How is that possible??) while the field is expected to be almost 100 V/m. That is practically not possible. Also the frequency is just too low. At 280 kHz no 100 V/m can be generated.
- The horizontal screenshot shows a frequency of 1 Hz.
- The vertical screenshot shows a frequency of 1 Hz
Review status[edit]
Did review. See remarks above. Joro (talk) 09:39, 30 January 2019 (CET)