Talk:RadiMation Application Note 108: Difference between revisions
(Created page with "The general purpose of this application note is to provide techniques how the calculations in RadiMation can be validated. The general rule for this is: RadiMation provides gr...") |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
An example would be to export the forward power and average field of a calibration to excel. | An example would be to export the forward power and average field of a calibration to excel. | ||
Then the forward power for an ideal field of 10 V/m can be calculated. | Then the forward power for an ideal field of 10 V/m can be calculated. | ||
Then the results of a real substitution test with that same calibration file, can be used to export the forward power again to excel to compare it with the manually calculated forward power. | Then the results of a real substitution test with that same calibration file, can be used to export the forward power again to excel to compare it with the manually calculated forward power. | ||
The differences between the excel calculated and the really applied forward power should be very small, which proves that the calculation in RadiMation is correct. | The differences between the excel calculated and the really applied forward power should be very small, which proves that the calculation in RadiMation is correct. | ||
For a further optimized calculation, also the 'calculated field' from the substitution test can be used to correct the really applied forward power, which will result in an even smaller difference between the excel calculated and the really applied forward power. | For a further optimized calculation, also the 'calculated field' from the substitution test can be used to correct the really applied forward power, which will result in an even smaller difference between the excel calculated and the really applied forward power. | ||
Another example is how to verify the modulation conservation: | |||
Perform a test with modulation, and then perform a test with modulation and conservation. Depending on the modulation depth, the difference in the signal power as it is shown in the graphs can be used to determine if the correct step is performed. | |||
This can again be done by exporting the graphs to excel and comparing them. | |||
[[User:Joro|Joro]] ([[User talk:Joro|talk]]) 10:15, 29 January 2019 (CET) | [[User:Joro|Joro]] ([[User talk:Joro|talk]]) 10:15, 29 January 2019 (CET) | ||
Revision as of 09:20, 29 January 2019
The general purpose of this application note is to provide techniques how the calculations in RadiMation can be validated. The general rule for this is: RadiMation provides graphs where you can see the measured data. Using export to excel the data can be made available in excel, where own calculations can be performed to determine the value.
An example would be to export the forward power and average field of a calibration to excel.
Then the forward power for an ideal field of 10 V/m can be calculated. Then the results of a real substitution test with that same calibration file, can be used to export the forward power again to excel to compare it with the manually calculated forward power. The differences between the excel calculated and the really applied forward power should be very small, which proves that the calculation in RadiMation is correct. For a further optimized calculation, also the 'calculated field' from the substitution test can be used to correct the really applied forward power, which will result in an even smaller difference between the excel calculated and the really applied forward power.
Another example is how to verify the modulation conservation:
Perform a test with modulation, and then perform a test with modulation and conservation. Depending on the modulation depth, the difference in the signal power as it is shown in the graphs can be used to determine if the correct step is performed. This can again be done by exporting the graphs to excel and comparing them.