Difference between revisions of "Talk:RadiMation Application Note 104"
(Created page with 'Isn't the performing of a current sensor calibration, not simply performing a cable calibration using the attenuation/gain calibration module? The determined attenuation is a lit…') |
|||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
[[User:Joro|Joro]] 09:13, 6 October 2015 (UTC) | [[User:Joro|Joro]] 09:13, 6 October 2015 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Another idea: What does Google say on: "how to calibrate RF Current sensor"? | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[User:Joro|Joro]] 09:14, 6 October 2015 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 09:14, 6 October 2015
Isn't the performing of a current sensor calibration, not simply performing a cable calibration using the attenuation/gain calibration module? The determined attenuation is a little bit higher than a standard cable, but the principle is the same.
Joro 09:13, 6 October 2015 (UTC)
Another idea: What does Google say on: "how to calibrate RF Current sensor"?
Joro 09:14, 6 October 2015 (UTC)
