Talk:RadiMation Application Note 110: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
* First perform a field leveling on 1 probe, then use determined power for power leveling on the other probes. | * First perform a field leveling on 1 probe, then use determined power for power leveling on the other probes. | ||
* If multiple field probes are used, ensure that the difference between them is small. Any mismeasurement between them will directly result in a higher overall error. | * If multiple field probes are used, ensure that the difference between them is small. Any mismeasurement between them will directly result in a higher overall error. | ||
* Also see: #6409: App. Note for a 16 point UFA calibration using field levelling for the the first point, and power levelling for the other 15 points | |||
Latest revision as of 15:44, 8 February 2016
Points to discuss in this application note:
- More than 16 points calculation
- 9 point and/or 5 point calculation
- Using the UFA calculation for GTEM's?
- Also why result is different, and on power not reached because lowest field strength calculation is used, which results in high very power levels.
- Amplifier linear part verification
- First perform a field leveling on 1 probe, then use determined power for power leveling on the other probes.
- If multiple field probes are used, ensure that the difference between them is small. Any mismeasurement between them will directly result in a higher overall error.
- Also see: #6409: App. Note for a 16 point UFA calibration using field levelling for the the first point, and power levelling for the other 15 points