|
|
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| − | I do have some suggestions to further improve the application note: | + | I do have a few remarks for the improvements of this application note: |
| − | * The table of contents is shown twice | + | * The last screenshot: ([[:File:EnhancedWindowWithTest.png]]), shows an EUT window, a test and the Enhanced status window. The EUT Window is not relevant for the purpose of the screenshot, but it does cause that the screenshot is very wide. I think we should improve the screenshot to NOT show the EUT window. |
| − | * Isn't it better to have a screenshot of the result in the introduction. It will make it clear how the result will be.
| + | * The values on all the screenshots that show the enhanced status window are very strange. They should be updated to show more logical values (maybe configure it in the KETC??): |
| − | * The 'ScreenElement' macro can be used to indicate button names. I already modified it on a few locations. But not yet on all locations | + | ** The last screenshot ([[:File:EnhancedWindowWithTest.png]]) shows: -200 dBm signal power (How is that possible??) while the field is expected to be almost 100 V/m. That is practically not possible. Also the frequency is just too low. At 280 kHz no 100 V/m can be generated. |
| − | * The 'Remove' button and the 'Custom Status window' checkbox are not explained.
| + | ** The horizontal screenshot shows a frequency of 1 Hz. |
| − | * The section of 'Horizontal' or 'Vertical' doesn't show any text. Maybe it is better to provide a screenshot of the enhanced status window for each situation. Then the difference will be very clear... | + | ** The vertical screenshot shows a frequency of 1 Hz |
| − | * I Suggest to include a screenshot of an example after the 'List Of measurement parameters'. | |
| − | * Then at the end of the document it is very helpful to show a screenshot during a test, where also the enhanced status window is shown | |
| − | * In that last section it should also be explained that if the enhanced status window is closed, it can be shown again from the 'Window' menu.
| |
| | | | |
| − | [[User:Joro|Joro]] 10:01, 15 July 2015 (UTC)
| |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| − | * The table of contents is shown twice
| + | == Review status == |
| − | '''-> removed the additional table of contents.'''
| + | Did review. See remarks above. [[User:Joro|Joro]] ([[User talk:Joro|talk]]) 09:39, 30 January 2019 (CET) |
| − | * Isn't it better to have a screenshot of the result in the introduction. It will make it clear how the result will be.
| |
| − | '''-> agreed inserted two screenshots of possible end results.'''
| |
| − | * The 'ScreenElement' macro can be used to indicate button names. I already modified it on a few locations. But not yet on all locations.
| |
| − | '''-> Good idea, will update the whole text and use it from now on.'''
| |
| − | * The 'Remove' button and the 'Custom Status window' checkbox are not explained.
| |
| − | '''-> Extended the explanation to include this.'''
| |
| − | * The section of 'Horizontal' or 'Vertical' doesn't show any text. Maybe it is better to provide a screenshot of the enhanced status window for each situation. Then the difference will be very clear...
| |
| − | '''-> Already had those screenshots ready to be implemented. Updated the text.'''
| |
| − | * I Suggest to include a screenshot of an example after the 'List Of measurement parameters'.
| |
| − | '''-> Already had this screenshots ready to be implemented. Updated the text.'''
| |
| − | * Then at the end of the document it is very helpful to show a screenshot during a test, where also the enhanced status window is shown
| |
| − | '''- > I agree and will create such screenshot and description.'''
| |
| − | * In that last section it should also be explained that if the enhanced status window is closed, it can be shown again from the 'Window' menu.
| |
| − | '''- > I agree, however I was not able to reopen this window after it was closed...'''
| |
| − | | |
| − | [[User:Sast|Sast]] 11:17, 14 August 2015 (UTC) | |
| − | | |
| − | | |
| − | Ok. These improvements are very good additions.
| |
| − | I further improved some sentences, and implemented some markup changes.
| |
| − | | |
| − | All is ok for me, but the the last section is very strange.
| |
| − | You explain everything us Frequency, signal power and calculated field. Then at the end suddenly the calculated field is replaced by the Average field.
| |
| − | I agree that it is described in the text, however it seems very unlogical.
| |
| − | I suggest to create a new screenshot that shows: Frequency, Signal power and Calculated field.
| |
| − | Maybe it is even better to show in this last section, a screenshot of the complete RadiMation window, including the test running, and the enhanced status window.
| |
| − | | |
| − | And I decided that we will not allow to reopen the Enhanced Status Window after it has been closed. This functionality has not been present anymore for a long time (if at all it ever has been working in the past).
| |
| − | | |
| − | But see the request: #5698: Possibility to re-open the Enhanced Status Window after closing
| |
| − | | |
| − | [[User:Joro|Joro]] 14:29, 27 August 2015 (UTC) | |
