Difference between revisions of "Talk:RadiMation Application Note 100"
(Created page with 'I do have some remarks: * The table of contents is shown twice * Isn't it better to have a screenshot of the result in the introduction. It will make it clear how the result will…') |
|||
(15 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | I | + | MAHE: I have applied the requested changes |
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | [[User:Joro|Joro]] | + | |
+ | I do have a few remarks for the improvements of this application note: | ||
+ | * The last screenshot: ([[:File:EnhancedWindowWithTest.png]]), shows an EUT window, a test and the Enhanced status window. The EUT Window is not relevant for the purpose of the screenshot, but it does cause that the screenshot is very wide. I think we should improve the screenshot to NOT show the EUT window. | ||
+ | * The values on all the screenshots that show the enhanced status window are very strange. They should be updated to show more logical values (maybe configure it in the KETC??): | ||
+ | ** The last screenshot ([[:File:EnhancedWindowWithTest.png]]) shows: -200 dBm signal power (How is that possible??) while the field is expected to be almost 100 V/m. That is practically not possible. Also the frequency is just too low. At 280 kHz no 100 V/m can be generated. | ||
+ | ** The horizontal screenshot shows a frequency of 1 Hz. | ||
+ | ** The vertical screenshot shows a frequency of 1 Hz | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | == Review status == | ||
+ | Applied review changes. [[User:Mahe|Mahe]] ([[User talk:Mahe|talk]]) 09:45, 12 Februari 2019 (CET) | ||
+ | |||
+ | Did review. See remarks above. [[User:Joro|Joro]] ([[User talk:Joro|talk]]) 09:39, 30 January 2019 (CET) | ||
+ | |||
+ | ROGE: Reviewed. [[User:Roge|Roge]] ([[User talk:Roge|talk]]) 15:45, 26 February 2019 (CET) |
Latest revision as of 14:47, 26 February 2019
MAHE: I have applied the requested changes
I do have a few remarks for the improvements of this application note:
- The last screenshot: (File:EnhancedWindowWithTest.png), shows an EUT window, a test and the Enhanced status window. The EUT Window is not relevant for the purpose of the screenshot, but it does cause that the screenshot is very wide. I think we should improve the screenshot to NOT show the EUT window.
- The values on all the screenshots that show the enhanced status window are very strange. They should be updated to show more logical values (maybe configure it in the KETC??):
- The last screenshot (File:EnhancedWindowWithTest.png) shows: -200 dBm signal power (How is that possible??) while the field is expected to be almost 100 V/m. That is practically not possible. Also the frequency is just too low. At 280 kHz no 100 V/m can be generated.
- The horizontal screenshot shows a frequency of 1 Hz.
- The vertical screenshot shows a frequency of 1 Hz
Review status
Applied review changes. Mahe (talk) 09:45, 12 Februari 2019 (CET)
Did review. See remarks above. Joro (talk) 09:39, 30 January 2019 (CET)