Difference between revisions of "Talk:RadiMation Application Note 100"

From RadiWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
 
(8 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
I do have some suggestions to further improve the application note:
+
MAHE: I have applied the requested changes
* The table of contents is shown twice
 
* Isn't it better to have a screenshot of the result in the introduction. It will make it clear how the result will be.
 
* The 'ScreenElement' macro can be used to indicate button names. I already modified it on a few locations. But not yet on all locations
 
* The 'Remove' button and the 'Custom Status window' checkbox are not explained.
 
* The section of 'Horizontal' or 'Vertical' doesn't show any text. Maybe it is better to provide a screenshot of the enhanced status window for each situation. Then the difference will be very clear...
 
* I Suggest to include a screenshot of an example after the 'List Of measurement parameters'.
 
* Then at the end of the document it is very helpful to show a screenshot during a test, where also the enhanced status window is shown
 
* In that last section it should also be explained that if the enhanced status window is closed, it can be shown again from the 'Window' menu.
 
  
[[User:Joro|Joro]] 10:01, 15 July 2015 (UTC)
 
  
 +
I do have a few remarks for the improvements of this application note:
 +
* The last screenshot: ([[:File:EnhancedWindowWithTest.png]]), shows an EUT window, a test and the Enhanced status window. The EUT Window is not relevant for the purpose of the screenshot, but it does cause that the screenshot is very wide. I think we should improve the screenshot to NOT show the EUT window.
 +
* The values on all the screenshots that show the enhanced status window are very strange. They should be updated to show more logical values (maybe configure it in the KETC??):
 +
** The last screenshot ([[:File:EnhancedWindowWithTest.png]]) shows: -200 dBm signal power (How is that possible??) while the field is expected to be almost 100 V/m. That is practically not possible. Also the frequency is just too low. At 280 kHz no 100 V/m can be generated.
 +
** The horizontal screenshot shows a frequency of 1 Hz.
 +
** The vertical screenshot shows a frequency of 1 Hz
  
* The table of contents is shown twice
 
'''-> removed the additional table of contents.'''
 
* Isn't it better to have a screenshot of the result in the introduction. It will make it clear how the result will be.
 
'''-> agreed inserted two screenshots of possible end results.'''
 
* The 'ScreenElement' macro can be used to indicate button names. I already modified it on a few locations. But not yet on all locations.
 
'''-> Good idea, will update the whole text and use it from now on.'''
 
* The 'Remove' button and the 'Custom Status window' checkbox are not explained.
 
'''-> Extended the explanation to include this.'''
 
* The section of 'Horizontal' or 'Vertical' doesn't show any text. Maybe it is better to provide a screenshot of the enhanced status window for each situation. Then the difference will be very clear...
 
'''-> Already had those screenshots ready to be implemented. Updated the text.'''
 
* I Suggest to include a screenshot of an example after the 'List Of measurement parameters'.
 
'''-> Already had this screenshots ready to be implemented. Updated the text.'''
 
* Then at the end of the document it is very helpful to show a screenshot during a test, where also the enhanced status window is shown
 
'''- > I agree and will create such screenshot and description.'''
 
* In that last section it should also be explained that if the enhanced status window is closed, it can be shown again from the 'Window' menu.
 
'''- > I agree, however I was not able to reopen this window after it was closed...'''
 
  
[[User:Sast|Sast]] 11:17, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
 
  
 +
== Review status ==
 +
Applied review changes.        [[User:Mahe|Mahe]] ([[User talk:Mahe|talk]]) 09:45, 12 Februari 2019 (CET)
  
Ok. These improvements are very good additions.
+
Did review. See remarks above. [[User:Joro|Joro]] ([[User talk:Joro|talk]]) 09:39, 30 January 2019 (CET)
I further improved some sentences, and implemented some markup changes.
 
  
All is ok for me, but the the last section is very strange.  
+
ROGE: Reviewed. [[User:Roge|Roge]] ([[User talk:Roge|talk]]) 15:45, 26 February 2019 (CET)
You explain everything us Frequency, signal power and calculated field. Then at the end suddenly the calculated field is replaced by the Average field.
 
I agree that it is described in the text, however it seems very unlogical.
 
I suggest to create a new screenshot that shows: Frequency, Signal power and Calculated field.
 
Maybe it is even better to show in this last section, a screenshot of the complete RadiMation window, including the test running, and the enhanced status window.
 
 
 
And we should investigate if it is possible to reopen the enhanced status window once it has been closed.
 
 
 
[[User:Joro|Joro]] 14:29, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
 

Latest revision as of 14:47, 26 February 2019

MAHE: I have applied the requested changes


I do have a few remarks for the improvements of this application note:

  • The last screenshot: (File:EnhancedWindowWithTest.png), shows an EUT window, a test and the Enhanced status window. The EUT Window is not relevant for the purpose of the screenshot, but it does cause that the screenshot is very wide. I think we should improve the screenshot to NOT show the EUT window.
  • The values on all the screenshots that show the enhanced status window are very strange. They should be updated to show more logical values (maybe configure it in the KETC??):
    • The last screenshot (File:EnhancedWindowWithTest.png) shows: -200 dBm signal power (How is that possible??) while the field is expected to be almost 100 V/m. That is practically not possible. Also the frequency is just too low. At 280 kHz no 100 V/m can be generated.
    • The horizontal screenshot shows a frequency of 1 Hz.
    • The vertical screenshot shows a frequency of 1 Hz


Review status

Applied review changes. Mahe (talk) 09:45, 12 Februari 2019 (CET)

Did review. See remarks above. Joro (talk) 09:39, 30 January 2019 (CET)

ROGE: Reviewed. Roge (talk) 15:45, 26 February 2019 (CET)